Joint fit results to all SHARP IP measurements from 2006 July -- 2007 June
  Last updated 2009 Dec. 4 (J. Vaillancourt)

Fit results in table below shown for points > 0.75 * max(flux)

 - 350 micron runs include:
   2006 July   - Jupiter   (HWP = 89.)
   2007 Feb.   - Jupiter, Saturn (HWP = 91.)
   2007 Apr.,2 - Jupiter, Saturn (HWP = 88.)
 - column 'list_jupiter350' uses Jupiter data only

- Polarizations (P, q, u) are in percent, angles (phi) in degrees.
- "primed" values are measured at front of SHARP, "unprimed" values
  are measured at detector

- This differs from the previous analysis on 2007-July-16 in that I
  averaged the data into bins 10 degrees wide before doing the fits and
  used the dispersion in each bin as the error-bar on the binned value

value         	list_350	     list_jupiter350
-----         	--------      	     ---------------
q'_t	 	0.2631 +/- 0.0682    0.3723 +/- 0.0591
u'_t	 	0      +/- 0	     0      +/- 0
q_i	 	0.3882 +/- 0.0288    0.3776 +/- 0.0248
u_i	       -0.0412 +/- 0.0694    0.0339 +/- 0.0600
P'_t	 	0.2631 +/- 0.0682    0.3723 +/- 0.0591
phi'_t	  	0      +/- 0	     0      +/- 0	     
P_i	  	0.3904 +/- 0.0289    0.3791 +/- 0.0252
phi_i	       -3.03   +/- 5.07      2.57   +/- 4.52
chi^2/dof 	       1.08  		2.21

- Results vary, but within the stated errors, if fit uses 
  points > 0.90 * max(flux)
- the command line argument to use for sharp_combine for these are:
      list350:         0.0039 -0.0004 0.0026 0.0000
      list_jupiter350: 0.0038  0.0003 0.0037 0.0001

IP Fit results for data taken on Jupiter during 2009-September abserving run (HWP=91.).

value         	list_350
-----         	--------
q'_t	 	0.1587 +/- 0.0424
u'_t	 	0      +/- 0
q_i	 	0.2606 +/- 0.0152
u_i	       -0.0250 +/- 0.0418
P'_t	 	0.1587 +/- 0.0424
phi'_t	  	0      +/- 0
P_i	  	0.2618 +/- 0.0157
phi_i	       -2.74   +/- 4.56
chi^2/dof      		4.75

- the command line argument to use for sharp_combine for these are:
      list350:  0.0026 -0.0003 0.0016 0.0000